Legal Opinion

State v. Engram

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 19, 1991No. 1 CA-CR 89-074, 1 CA-CR 89-1549-PRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

The defendant was found guilty by a jury of theft, second-degree (residential) burglary, and first-degree (residential) criminal trespass. The charge of criminal trespass was a lesser included offense of second-degree burglary. As a matter of law, the defendant could not be convicted of both. See Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 168, 97 S.Ct. 2221, 2227, 53 L.Ed.2d 187, 196 (1977). The trial judge treated the verdict on the lesser included offense of criminal trespass as surplusage and entered judgment against the defendant only for second-degree burglary and theft. The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. NashArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. DonaldsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. WillitsArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. GendronArizona Supreme Court · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. RichArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. CanionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. United States v. Pedro Martinez-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. State v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. State v. EkmanisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API