Legal Opinion

McClaine v. Fairchild

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1901No. 3538PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.— Hon. James A. Williamson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, J.

The complaint, for cause of action against defendant (respondent), alleges substantially that in 1889 certain residents of Pierce county, at Steilacoom, made a proposal in writing to aid in the construction of a motor railway between Tacoma and Steilacoom. These persons were designated as the parties of the first part, and through certain trustees named as parties of the second part proposed to any company, person, or persons, who *761might accept the proposal, and who were designated as parties of the third part, that in consideration of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Morgan v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Roberts v. BeattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1830
  4. Roche v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Russell v. McCormickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blalock v. CondonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Thomas v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API