Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Beatty
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 15, 1830PublishedCited by 6 opinions
IN ERROR. Writ of error to the Common Pleas of Butler county. The whole case is so fully stated in the opinion of the- Courts that it renders any additional statement unnecessary.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Ross, J.
The plaintiff states his cause of action in this case, to be two several writings made by the defendant, and signed with his own proper hand, and delivered to the plaintiff for a full and valuable consideration in the words following:
“On the first day, of October next, due A. B. Roberts two bureaus at Carnahan’s shop in Butler. Wm. Beatty.
“May 31 st, 182,6.”
“On the first of January due Abner B. Roberts two bureaus at Carnahan’s shop in Butler, and one dough-chest. Wm. Beatty„
“May 31 st. 1S26.”
*64That the said bureaus and dough-chest, at the times…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lent v. PadelfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
- Jackson ex dem. Ludlow v. MyersNew York Supreme Court · 1808
- Harman v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1824
- Amory v. M'GregorNew York Supreme Court · 1818
- Wilt & Green v. OgdenNew York Supreme Court · 1816
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Southern Pacific Co. v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 1916
- Dickson v. DickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
- Crowl v. GoodenbergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- McClaine v. FairchildWashington Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.