Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Price

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1903No. 4768PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Richardson, J., entered January 20, 1903, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

This is an action on a promissory note given by defendant to plaintiffs on September 28, 1901, for $700, payable thirty days after date. Defendant denied plaintiffs’ ownership of said note, and also pleaded by way of counterclaim the ownership of a note made by plaintiffs severally and jointly with one J. E. McGinnis on February 13, 1903, bearing interest at the rate of five per cent per month, payable to the order of G. M. Hethercutt, and on July 30, 1901, sold and assigned by said Hethercutt to defendant; on which note certain payments were in the answer alleged to have been made, and on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Morgan v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Daly v. Everett Pulp & Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Barnes v. PackwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Roche v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. WalravenMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. F. M. Slagle & Co. v. BushnellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Arthur & Co. v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Cost Management Services, Inc. v. City of LakewoodWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Davis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API