Legal Opinion

Blalock v. Condon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1909No. 7751PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered April 22, 1908, in favor of the defendants, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action on a promissory note.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, C. J.

— This action was instituted to recover the balance due on a promissory note for the sum of $3,304.31, bearing date July 23, 1897, and payable on demand. The complaint alleged the execution and delivery of the note by the defendants, that the sum of $800 had been paid thereon on the 5th day of September, 1901, and that no other or further payments had been made. The action was commenced by personal service of summons and complaint on the 3d day of September, 1907, but the complaint was not filed in the office of the clerk of the superior court until the 11th day of November, 1907. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Seattle Electric Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Bay View Brewing Co. v. GrubbWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Cresswell v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Thomas v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Roche v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State v. LounsberyWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. National Ass'n of Creditors, Inc. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Lara v. SandellWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State ex rel. Teeter v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API