Legal Opinion

Caughey v. Rien

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1905No. 4457Published

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Belt, J., entered March 10, 1902, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, dismissing an action for partition.

1Per curiam

In this case respondents have interposed a motion to strike the statement of facts, and to affirm *297the judgment of the lower court, on the ground that the said statement is not certified as by law required, and does not enable this court to ascertain what evidence is proper to be considered on this appeal. From the record it appears that the appellants filed and served a proposed statement of facts in due time, and that, upon objections being made thereto, the trial judge refused to settle and certify the same as proposed. Thereupon, appellants, by permission of the court, submitted amendments…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Demaris v. BarkerWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Cadwell v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Wheeler, Osgood & Co. v. LagerWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Stenger v. RoederWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Bartlett v. ReicheneckerWashington Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API