Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Reichenecker

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1893No. 872PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King Cou/nty.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, C. J.

Respondent moves to strike the statement of facts embraced in the transcript in this case, for the reason that it appears from the transcript that the judgment in said cause was not rendered until after the said pretended statement of facts was settled, and that therefore the certificate of the judge that said statement contains all the material facts in the said cause is incorrect and insufficient.

The transcript shows that the statement of facts was settled in this cause on the 7th day of April, 1892, and that the judgment was rendered on…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Citizens' National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Caughey v. RienWashington Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API