Legal Opinion

Wheeler, Osgood & Co. v. Lager

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1892No. 409PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. Motion by respondents to dismiss the appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

This was an action for the foreclosure of mechanics’ liens. The respondents appeared specially, and moved to dismiss the appeal herein for the reason that • the transcript does not contain a statement of facts showing all the testimony on which the case was tried below, and that no such statement of facts had been settled or filed. The respondents also ask for attorneys’ fees in addition to the amount allowed by the lower court. It appearing that the transcript does not contain a statement of facts, and that the evidence upon which the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Croke v. Farmers Highline Canal & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  2. Quist v. Empire Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. WelshIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Caughey v. RienWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Rice v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API