Legal Opinion

Demaris v. Barker

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1903No. 4405PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Walla Walla county, Chadwick, J., entered February 6, 1902, upon findings in favor of plaintiff after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, perpetually restraining the sale of lands of an estate to pay debts.

1Per curiam

The respondent brought this action to enjoin the appellants from selling, or causing to be sold, as property of the estate of S aren a Barker, deceased, certain real property situated in Walla Walla county, and to quiet his title to the same. The respondent was successful in the court below, and this appeal is from the decree entered in his favor.

As a preliminary question, the appellants urge that the trial judge was without jurisdiction to render a judgment *202in this cause at the time he rendered the judgment appealed from, for the reason that more than ninety days had elapsed since he had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Balch v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hill v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Christofferson v. PfennigWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Hanford v. DaviesWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. In Re CressWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Williams v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Faires v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API