Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Peterson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 3, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 27, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she lost her employment due to misconduct.
Claimant was discharged from her employment as a sandwich production person when she refused a manager’s request that she report to another of the employer’s locations to run sandwich production and assist with preclosing duties. Following a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge found that claimant’s refusal to comply with the directive was without good cause and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Claim of PadillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re the Claim of GortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of MercureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of FrancanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of AnumahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of BoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of MinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of StanczykAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Claim of AtsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009