Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Francano
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 4, 2004PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 19, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant was discharged from her employment as vice-president of designing and merchandising due to disqualifying misconduct. It is well settled that insubordination and an employee’s refusal to comply with reasonable requests of the employer can constitute…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of KretchmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of AttaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of PasquarosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Claim of GuagliardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of PetersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of PearlsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of DaniulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of StonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.