Legal Opinion

Honolulu Redevelopment Agency v. Pun Gun

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1967No. 4500PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

RICHARDSON, C.J.

Condemnor Honolulu Redevelopment Agency, hereinafter referred to as Plaintiff, appeals from a judgment in a condemnation, proceeding after a trial by jury which fixed the value, of the property to be acquired by the plaintiff.

Mrs. Pun Gun, hereinafter referred to as Defendant, owns a parcel of land located in the plaintiff’s Kukui Redevelopment Project area. The irregularly-shaped parcel of land contains about 14,270 square feet and improvements thereon consist of 11 wooden tenement buildings which are very old and do not conform to the building code.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. City of Los Angeles v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Territory of Hawaii v. AdelmeyerHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Siebrand v. GossnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. Dillingham Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State, by Atty. Gen. v. Pioneer Mill Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Tax Appeal of Weinberg Ex Rel. WKH Corp. v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. City of Detroit v. DETROIT PLAZA LTD. PARTNERSHIPMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. City & County of Honolulu v. International Air Service Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API