Legal Opinion

Allen v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 22, 2016No. 1204909; A158848PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, in which the board concluded that claimant’s rotator cuff injury was a “consequential condition” subject to a “major contributing cause” standard of proof. Claimant challenges that conclusion. Because the board applied the correct legal standard and substantial evidence supports the board’s order, we affirm.

We take the following facts from the findings in the board’s order. ORS 183.482(7). Claimant was injured while working as a logger, when a falling log struck him behind his left shoulder. Claimant immediately began…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Albany General Hospital v. GasperinoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. SAIF Corp. v. PepperlingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. CromptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arms v. SAIF Corp. (In re Arms)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API