Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Pepperling

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 1, 2010No. 0802264; A141905PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

SAIF seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board on reconsideration setting aside SAIF’s denial of claimant’s new or omitted medical condition claim for an infection of his finger diagnosed as methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). SAIF asserts that the claim should be analyzed as a consequential condition, to which the major contributing cause standard of proof applies, ORS 656.005(7)(a)(A), and contends that the board erred in applying the material contributing cause standard of proof and in determining that the condition is compensable. We conclude that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Albany General Hospital v. GasperinoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. CromptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Asten-Hill Co. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. SAIF Corp. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Armenta v. PCC Structural, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Dynea USA, Inc. v. FairbanksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. Horizon Air Industries, Inc. v. Davis-WarrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API