Legal Opinion
McKay v. Communispond, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 28, 1983No. 83 Civ. 2731 (JMC)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CANNELLA, District Judge:
Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction is granted and his motion adjudging defendant in contempt is denied. Fed. R.Civ.P. 44, 65.
Defendant’s cross-motion for a preliminary injunction is granted in part and denied in part. Fed.R.Civ.P. 65.
Both parties’ requests for attorneys’ fees are denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff commenced this action premised on diversity jurisdiction, seeking to enjoin defendant Communispond, Inc. [“Communispond”] from interfering with his right to pursue his career as an instructor in the communications field. Shortly…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Vuitton Et Fils S. A. v. Carousel Handbags, and Solomon Mizrahi, Joseph Mizrahi, and Maurice Mizrahi, Additional DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Columbia Ribbon & Carbon Manufacturing Co. v. A-1-A Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Purchasing Associates, Inc. v. WeitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Leo Silfen, Inc. v. CreamNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- American Federal Group, Ltd. And Dennis A. Herman, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Barnett Rothenberg, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- LinkCo, Inc. v. Fujitsu Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Apollo Technologies Corp. v. Centrosphere Industrial Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Consolidated Brands, Inc. v. MondiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Webcraft Technologies, Inc. v. McCawDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.