LinkCo, Inc. v. Fujitsu Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Fujitsu has moved for a judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) at the close of LinkCo’s case, arguing that LinkCo failed to present sufficient evidence for a jury to find in its favor on any of the remaining three causes of action: (1) tortious interference with contract, (2) misappropriation of trade secret, and (3) unfair competition. 1 The parties have fully briefed the issue and this Court has heard oral argument. 2
Fujitsu submits that a JMOL is required because LinkCo has failed to offer sufficient proof on at least one element of each claim. See…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Marilyn GALDIERI-AMBROSINI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CORP., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Saratoga Vichy Spring Co., Inc. v. Orin Lehman, Commissioner of Parks and Recreation of the the State of New York and Waters of Saratoga Springs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Samuel Albert v. Salmen Loksen, Brooklyn Hospital and Karen BuonoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- North Atlantic Instruments, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Fred Haber and Apex Signal Corp., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Berman v. SUGO LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Hall v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Medtech Products Inc. v. RANIR, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- DSMC, INC. v. Convera Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Altavion, Inc. v. Konica Minolta System Laboratory, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.