Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Kroger Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1995No. 94APE10-1504PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Close, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Helen Hancock, appeals from an entry of dismissal filed by the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, in favor of defendant-appellee, the Kroger Company. She brings the following assignments of error:

“ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 1.
“The Court of Common Pleas erred in holding that the ‘double dismissal’ rule, sometimes called the ‘two dismissal’ rule, of Civil Rule 41(A)(1), precluded Plaintiff-Appellant from maintaining her present action. * * *
“ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 2.
“For notices of dismissal to operate as an adjudication upon the merits, both dismissals must…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frysinger v. LeechOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Graham v. PavariniOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Thomas v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Thomas v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Byers v. Robinson, 08ap-204 (9-23-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Dargart v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Hutchinson v. WenzkeOhio Court of Appeals · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API