Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Freeman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1997No. 1996-0002PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 221.] THOMAS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. FREEMAN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Thomas v. Freeman,

1997-Ohio-395.] Civil procedure—Dismissal of actions—Civ.R. 41(B)(4), construed—When a court dismisses a case for lack of service under Civ.R. 41(B)(4), the plaintiff may utilize the savings statute to refile within one year, when. 1. When a plaintiff has failed to obtain service on a defendant, whether the court dismisses the case under Civ.R. 4(E) (failure to obtain service) or Civ.R. 41(B)(1) (failure to prosecute), the dismissal is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Maryhew v. YovaOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Thomas v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Perotti v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Jones v. HartranftOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Ohio Furniture Co. v. MindalaOhio Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Byers v. Robinson, 08ap-204 (9-23-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Brown v. Solon Pointe at Emerald RidgeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. CapitalSource Bank FBO Aeon Fin., L.L.C. v. Donshirs Dev., Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Hamrick v. RamaliaOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. McCullough v. BennettOhio Supreme Court · 2024

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API