Legal Opinion

Abraham Lehr, Inc. v. Cortez

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 1943No. Civ. 13699PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, J. pro tem.

It was error to enter a judgment dismissing plaintiff’s amended complaint, even though it appeared that plaintiff’s cause of action arose in connection with an employment agency contract and it did not appear that plaintiff had referred its controversy with the defendant to the State Labor Commissioner before appealing to the superior court for relief.

The contention of the defendant in support of the judgment is that this action was prematurely brought because there had been no prior compliance with the first sentence of section 1647, Labor Code, which reads: “In all eases…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alderson v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Collier & Wallis, Ltd. v. AstorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hanes v. CoffeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Sobelman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Atkinson v. District Bond Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Guerrieri v. SeveriniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Silva v. MercierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Buchwald v. Superior Court of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Wetsel v. GaribaldiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API