Merchants' & Manufacturers' Bank v. Hibbard
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. Replevin. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
In this action of replevin the right to a certain quantity of wheat and to flour manufactured therefrom comes in 'question.
From the evidence incorporated in the record it appears that' on the 16th day of January, 1880, the defendants with •some others were doing a merchant milling business in the •city of Grahd Bapids under the co-partnership name of Hibbard & Graff, in two mills known respectively as the •Crescent Mills and the Yalley City Mills. On that day Mr. Hibbard, one of the defendants, made an application to the cashier of the plaintiff for the loan to their firm of the sum of twenty…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parshall v. . EggertNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Gibson v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- First National Bank of Green Bay v. DearbornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Gregory v. WendellMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Taylor v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Fishback v. G. W. Van Dusen & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Conrad v. FisherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
- Alabama State Bank v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Citizens Banking Co. v. Peacock & CarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- National Exchange Bank v. WilderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.