Legal Opinion

Kimberly v. . Patchin

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1859PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Both parties trace their title to the wheat in controversy to D.O. Dickinson, who was the former owner, and held it in store at Littlefort, Wisconsin. The defendant claims through a sale made by Dickinson to one Shuttleworth on the 18th of February, 1848. If that sale was effectual to pass the title, it is not now pretended that there is any ground on which the plaintiffs can recover in this suit. The sale to the person under whom they claim, was about two and a half months junior in point of time.

The sale to Shuttleworth was by a writing in the form of a present transfer of six thousand…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pleasants v. PendletonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1828

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Parshall v. . EggertNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Geoghegan Sons & Co. v. Arbuckle Bros.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  3. Cooke v. . MillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Buskirk Bros. v. PeckWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API