Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint of Southfield Against Ameritech Michigan
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 30, 1999No. Docket 207191PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
Ameritech Michigan appeals as of right the September 30, 1997, opinion and order of the Public Service Commission requiring Ameritech to improve its 911 database and to pay the attorney fees of the city of Southfield incurred in this administrative proceeding. We affirm in all substantive respects, but we reverse the award of attorney fees.
The city of Southfield is a member municipality in the Oakland County Emergency Telephone District (ETD), MCL 484.1102(f); MSA 22.1467(102)(f). The Oakland County ETD utilizes universal emergency number service or 911 service, subsections 102(y) and (z).…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AllenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Myrtle Beach Pipeline Corp. v. Emerson Electric Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1993
- Valentine v. Redford Township SupervisorMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Jackson v. Michigan Corrections CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ameritech Michigan v. PSC MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMM'NMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. StephanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re Michigan Cable Telecommunications Ass'n ComplaintMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re MCI Telecommunications Corp. ComplaintMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re Complaint of Michigan Cable Telecommunications Ass'n Against Ameritech MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.