Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Allen
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided September 27, 1973No. Docket 12457, 12458PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Per curiam
After an automobile collision, Richard Cygan and his wife commenced an action against the driver of the other automobile, Bobby Ross, and the owner, Ross’s brother-in-law Carl Allen. State Farm, which had been assigned Allen’s policy under the assigned risk plan, was called upon to defend Ross and Allen.
State Farm commenced this action against the Cygans, Ross, and Allen seeking a declaration of rights. Count 1 sought rescission of the insurance contract for Allen’s alleged failure to provide accu rate information in the insurance application. Count 2 alleged that State Farm was exculpated…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Oppenhuizen v. WennerstenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Fredal v. ForsterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Roberts v. Michigan Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Harvey v. LewisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Sant v. Perronville Shingle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Matras v. Amoco Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Nepera Chemical, Inc. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Shepard Marine Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. KurylowiczMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Dassance v. NienhuisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.