Legal Opinion

Calise v. Piro, No. Cv 90 0110288 S (Oct. 29, 1990)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 29, 1990No. CV 90 0110288 SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION In recent years, Conn. Gen. Stat. 42-110b, otherwise known as CUTPA, has received a lot of attention. In a nutshell, "CUTPA is a consumer protection statute intended to provide an individual with an action more flexible and a remedy more complete than does common law," Sprayform, Inc. v. Durant's Rental Centers, Inc., 39 Conn. Sup. 78, 79 (Super.Ct. 1983). The scope of CUTPA should be determined by "`the gradual process of judicial inclusion and exclusion.'" Murphy v. McNamara,36 Conn. Sup.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. R. F. Keppel & Bro. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Daddona v. Liberty Mobile Home Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Murphy v. McNamaraConnecticut Superior Court · 1979
  4. Sprayfoam, Inc. v. Durant's Rental Centers, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1983
  5. Lembo v. SchlesingerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API