Legal Opinion

City of Tallapoosa v. Brock

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 25, 1915PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Action for damages; from Haralson superior court.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. “Save as to eases specially provided for by law (such as exception to the grant of an injunction, or the appointment of or refusal to appoint a receiver), no case can be brought to this court by bill of exceptions, so long as the same is pending in the court below, unless the decision complained of would have been a final disposition of the case, had it been rendered as the excepting party claims that it should have been.” Baldwin v. Lowe, 129 Ga. 711 (59 S. E. 772); Civil Code (1910), § 6138.

*600June 25, 1915. Action for damages; from Haralson superior court. Lloyd Thomas and M. J. Head, for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BattleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Baldwin v. LoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Johnson v. Merchants & Farmers BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. English v. RosenkrantzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  2. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Peerless Laundry Co. v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Douglas v. HardinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Milosevich v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API