State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Stein
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentChief Justice Vollack
The majority determines that the definition of “pedestrian,” as found in the no-fault portion of the insurance policies issued by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance *391Company (State Farm) and in section 10-4-703(9), 4A C.R.S. (1994), of the No Fault Act, does not apply to the uninsured motorist (UM) coverage portion of the insurance policies at issue. The majority thus holds that “a bicyclist is not a ‘pedestrian’ within the meaning of the [UM] coverage portion of the automobile insurance policies” in this case. Maj. op. at 385. As such, the majority concludes that the anti-stacking…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pepcol Manufacturing Co. v. Denver Union Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Cung La v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Simon v. Shelter General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Lopez v. Dairyland Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Rose v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.