Legal Opinion

Sertich v. Moorman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 4, 1988No. 1 CA-CIV 9759PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Judge.

The primary issues on appeal are (1) whether summary judgment was properly entered against the assignees of a debt allegedly owed to a general partner by a limited partnership on grounds that a partnership accounting was a necessary prerequisite to the action; and (2) whether the assignees have standing to seek an accounting.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

One Civic Center Plaza Ltd. Partnership (“1 CCP”) was an Arizona limited partnership formed in 1983 to develop a commercial building in Scottsdale, Arizona. The general partners of 1 CCP were Gilbert Wilson, Steve Moorman…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bohmfalk v. VaughanArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Farnsworth v. HubbardArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. O'Neil v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  5. State v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sertich v. MoormanArizona Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API