Legal Opinion
Farnsworth v. Hubbard
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 1954No. 5718PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LA PRADE, Justice.
The facts leading to this appeal are these: Ray Farnsworth, a resident of Mesa, Arizona and now deceased, owned and possessed a lead mine in Mexico, under a Mexican mine title, which he had contracted to sell to the appellee M. L. Hubbard. Hubbard had taken possession and made periodic remittances to Farnsworth as contemplated by the terms of the contract. Ray Farnsworth later died intestate in Arizona, survived by his widow and ten children. His widow was appointed administratrix in Maricopa County, Arizona. One of his sons, Melvin Farnsworth, was by a Mexican court…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Michigan Trust Co. v. FerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Jacob v. MinerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- McMaster v. GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United Bank v. Mesa N. O. Nelson Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Zancanaro v. CrossArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Kilmer v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- In Re Estate of ThelenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Schilling v. EmbreeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.