Legal Opinion

Sertich v. Moorman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1989No. CV-88-0484-PRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Chief Justice.

Nancy J. Sertich and C. William Sund-blad (plaintiffs) seek review of a court of appeals’ decision affirming summary judgment against them. The court of appeals agreed that this action could not proceed without an accounting and that plaintiffs lacked standing to seek an accounting. Sertich et al v. Moorman et al, 159 Ariz. 311, 767 P.2d 34 (Ariz.Ct.App.1988). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), and Ariz.R.Civ.App.P. 23, 17B A.R.S. We now vacate the court of appeals opinion, reverse the trial court’s grant of summary judgment and remand for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Fernandez v. GarzaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Staffco, Inc. v. Maricopa Trading Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Seeley v. DunlopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  5. Boyle v. WebbArizona Supreme Court · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Drenis v. HaligiannisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  2. Dunn v. ZimmermanOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. LA CANADA HILLS LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. KiteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. OLP, L.L.C. v. BurninghamUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Estate of Kirschenbaum v. KirschenbaumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API