Legal Opinion

Bohmfalk v. Vaughan

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1960No. 6783PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHELPS, Justice.

This is an appeal by appellants, defendants below from a judgment entered in favor of the appellee-plaintiff. The parties will be referred to as defendants and plaintiff as they appeared in the trial court. The cause was submitted to the jury on interrogatories. The court then made findings of fact and conclusions of law on the request of the defendants.

From the record it appears that prior to August 1953 the plaintiff was operating a service station business in Douglas, Arizona, in a service station owned by Standard Oil Company, and leased to him. Thereafter negotiations…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pioneer Constructors v. SymesArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Carrillo v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Hightower v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Preston v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. In Re Brandt's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  3. Acheson v. ShafterArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Kingsbery v. KingsberyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Milam v. MilamArizona Supreme Court · 1966

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API