Legal Opinion

Russell v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 6, 1963No. 456-61PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitakeR, Judge

In this action, arising on cross-motions for summary judgment, plaintiff seeks to recover retired pay based upon 75 percent of the basic pay of a lieutenant in the Navy, to which he claims he is entitled under the provisions of section 412(a) of the Officer Personnel Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 874.

Plaintiff first enlisted in the Regular Navy on September 20,1915. He served as an enlisted man until March 15,1931, at which time he ivas transferred to inactive status in the Fleet Naval Reserve. During this active enlisted service *185plaintiff was specially cited for extraordinary heroism in actual…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Gordon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  3. Odell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  4. Richard L. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  5. Seastrom v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Entines v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  2. Osborn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Navajo Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  4. Fields v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. Barney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API