Legal Opinion

Fields v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 20, 1970No. 71-69PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PeR Curiam :

This is a suit by Nathaniel A. Fields, to his own use, and to the uses of Martha Foster, Sallie Foster, Florence Foster, and Frank Foster to recover certain oil and gas rents and royalties in the total amount of $3,100,000 allegedly held by the Secretary of the Interior. Nathaniel A. Fields states that he is a necessary party to this action as the result of a power of attorney executed by one Abe W. Foster on September Y, 1934, empowering said plaintiff to act in his behalf. The other four plaintiffs all claim to 'be the children of Abe W. Foster, thus entitling them, as heirs, to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
  2. Russell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Juda v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  3. Horton Capoeman v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  4. Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Simmons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API