Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Hadgis
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 1951No. Civ. 18161PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
Alleging ownership of a parcel of real property, plaintiffs brought this action against defendants Hadgis and James Arnold to remove the cloud of an alleged invalid attachment • levied on the property in an action in which Hadgis was plaintiff and James Arnold was defendant. Judgment was entered quieting plaintiffs’ title, declaring the claims of defendant to be without right, and decreeing the purported levy of attachment to be null and void. Defendant Hadgis has appealed from the judgment.
On July 15,1947, plaintiff Oliver Arnold loaned his brother James $15,000 and took the latter’s note…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PostedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Chichester v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Cook v. HuntleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Wheeler v. BarkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Butler v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- T W M Homes, Inc. v. Atherwood Realty & Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Blumenstein v. Phillips Insurance Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Jackson v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.