Skinner v. City of Phoenix
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
— O. P. Skinner, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought this action on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, under section 3736, Revised Code of 1928, which reads so far as material as follows :
“. . . When the question to be determined is one of a common or general interest of many persons, or when the parties are numerous and it is impracticable to bring them all before the court, one or more may sue or defend for the benefit of all.”
He asks for a declaratory judgment that a certain attempted annexation by the City of Phoenix of certain property contiguous thereto was void and of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. SULLIVAN v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Borchard v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Faulkner v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. BoehringerArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Territory of Arizona ex rel. Attorney-General v. Town of JeromeArizona Supreme Court · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Morton v. Johnson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- City of Tucson v. GarrettArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Portland General Electric Co. v. City of EstacadaOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Jennings v. WoodsArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Colquhoun v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1940
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.