Morton v. Johnson City
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett
This is a suit attacking the annexation of property by the appellant City. A number of suits were filed in the law court and one in the Chancery court attacking the ordinance of the City. Pursuant to Statute (Sec. 6-310, T.C.A.) all of these suits were consolidated and tried together. The ordinance which these suits attacked was passed pursuant to Statute (Sec. 6-309', T.C.A.) authorizing the appellant City to annex territory which may be *415done “upon its own initiative when it appears that the prosperity of such municipality and territory will be materially retarded and the safety and welfare…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of St. Joseph v. HankinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Commonwealth v. SissonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Town of Alamo v. FORCUM-JAMES COMPANYTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
- Hunt v. HuntTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
- Williams v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Deane Hill Country Club, Inc. v. City of Knoxville and George F. McCanless Attorney General of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Highwoods Properties, Inc. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Balsinger v. Town of MadisonvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Kingsport v. State Ex Rel. Crown Enterprises, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. IglesiasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.