Legal Opinion

Morton v. Johnson City

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1960PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

This is a suit attacking the annexation of property by the appellant City. A number of suits were filed in the law court and one in the Chancery court attacking the ordinance of the City. Pursuant to Statute (Sec. 6-310, T.C.A.) all of these suits were consolidated and tried together. The ordinance which these suits attacked was passed pursuant to Statute (Sec. 6-309', T.C.A.) authorizing the appellant City to annex territory which may be *415done “upon its own initiative when it appears that the prosperity of such municipality and territory will be materially retarded and the safety and welfare…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of St. Joseph v. HankinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Commonwealth v. SissonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Town of Alamo v. FORCUM-JAMES COMPANYTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hunt v. HuntTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Williams v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Deane Hill Country Club, Inc. v. City of Knoxville and George F. McCanless Attorney General of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  2. Highwoods Properties, Inc. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State Ex Rel. Balsinger v. Town of MadisonvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  4. City of Kingsport v. State Ex Rel. Crown Enterprises, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. IglesiasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API