Legal Opinion

Froh v. Milwaukee Medical Clinic, SC

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 16, 1978No. 77-622PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoser, J.

The issue is whether the trial court committed prejudicial error in refusing to instruct the jury on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.

The two elements of res ipsa loquitur that must be present before the application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur are: (1) the accident must be of a kind which ordinarily does not occur in the absence of someone’s negligence; (2) that it must be caused by an agency or instrumentality within the exclusive control of the defendant. Turk v. H. C. Prange Co., 18 Wis.2d 547, 553, 119 N.W.2d 362 (1962); Fehrman v. Smirl, 20 Wis.2d 1, 26, 121 N.W.2d 255 (1962).

Th…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Trogun v. FruchtmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Turk v. H. C. Prange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Shier v. FreedmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Fehrman v. SmirlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Hestbeck v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Diego Gil v. James Reed, Jaime Penaflor, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Weiss v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Olfe v. GordonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Johnson v. Misericordia Community HospitalCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  5. Richards v. MendivilCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API