Morgan v. McGee
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, C.
In their printed briefs plaintiffs in error rely upon one proposition, which is that the trial court erred as a matter of law in holding that the deed of October 8, 1912, from the Dixons to Mittendorf was ineffectual and conveyed nothing. Upon, this preposition is based the further contention that the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrers to the evidence of plaintiff Morgan, and of the de.endant Mittendorf.
By the very nature of the action alleged in Morgan’s petition and in Mittendorf’s cross-petition, the subject-matter of the action must be real property. That…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Williamson v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
- Westmoreland N. Gas Co. v. DeWittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Kolachny v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Sult v. A. Hochstetter Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Dabney-Johnston Oil Corp. v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Bonner v. Oklahoma Rock Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Burns v. BastienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.