Legal Opinion

Morgan v. McGee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 9, 1926No. 13363PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

In their printed briefs plaintiffs in error rely upon one proposition, which is that the trial court erred as a matter of law in holding that the deed of October 8, 1912, from the Dixons to Mittendorf was ineffectual and conveyed nothing. Upon, this preposition is based the further contention that the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrers to the evidence of plaintiff Morgan, and of the de.endant Mittendorf.

By the very nature of the action alleged in Morgan’s petition and in Mittendorf’s cross-petition, the subject-matter of the action must be real property. That…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Williamson v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Westmoreland N. Gas Co. v. DeWittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  4. Kolachny v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Sult v. A. Hochstetter Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1908

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Dabney-Johnston Oil Corp. v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Bonner v. Oklahoma Rock Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Burns v. BastienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API