Legal Opinion

Tina Haro v. City of Los Angeles

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 18, 2014No. 12-55062, 12-55303, 12-55310, 12-55076PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Because of an exemption written into the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), Los Angeles City employees “engaged in fire protection” (i.e. firefighters) do not receive standard overtime pay — time and a half for all hours worked over forty in one workweek. Instead, firefighters receive overtime only after working 212 hours in a twenty-eight-day period.

Plaintiff fire department dispatchers and fire department aeromedical technicians (paramedics assigned to air ambulance helicopters) were denied standard overtime pay because the City of Los Angeles (the “City”)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Lawrence v. City of Philadelphia, Pa.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. RuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Haralson v. U.S. Aviation Servs. Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  2. Danny Flores v. City of San GabrielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Kenney v. Helix TCSCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  4. Kerzich v. Cnty. of TuolumneDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  5. Boyd v. Bank of America Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2015

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API