Legal Opinion
Kerzich v. Cnty. of Tuolumne
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 13, 2018No. 1:16-cv-01116-DAD-SABPublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dale A. Drozd, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter came before the court for hearing on plaintiffs' unopposed motion for approval of a settlement under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") on March 6, 2018. (See Doc. No. 58.) Attorney Paul Bird appeared on behalf of plaintiffs and attorney Arthur Hartinger appeared on behalf of defendants. Following the hearing, the court ordered plaintiffs to submit supplemental briefing addressing a number *1183of issues. (Doc. No. 62.) Plaintiffs timely filed this supplemental briefing on April 4, 2018. (Doc. No. 63.) For the reasons discussed below, the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Brown v. Tetra Tech, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Burton v. Nilkanth Pizza IncDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2020
- CARTEE-HARING v. CENTRAL BUCKS SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- Castro v. Paragon Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Chapman v. Prescott Station IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.