Legal Opinion

Van Sellner v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 29, 2016No. Appellate Case 2014-002472; Opinion 27644PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE HEARN:

Didier Van Sellner pled guilty to armed robbery and later applied for post-conviction relief (PCR), asserting his counsel was ineffective for advising him to take a plea deal when the State could not demonstrate all of the elements of armed robbery. The PCR court denied him relief, finding he received effective assistance of counsel. We reverse. 1

FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Van Sellner was charged with armed robbery. After consulting with counsel, he learned he could be subject to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole due to his prior convictions in New Jersey and New…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Suber v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Jamison v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Smalls v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  2. Mangal v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  3. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  4. Briggs v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  5. Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API