Van Sellner v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE HEARN:
Didier Van Sellner pled guilty to armed robbery and later applied for post-conviction relief (PCR), asserting his counsel was ineffective for advising him to take a plea deal when the State could not demonstrate all of the elements of armed robbery. The PCR court denied him relief, finding he received effective assistance of counsel. We reverse. 1
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Van Sellner was charged with armed robbery. After consulting with counsel, he learned he could be subject to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole due to his prior convictions in New Jersey and New…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Suber v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Jamison v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Smalls v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
- Mangal v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
- Briggs v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.