Legal Opinion

State v. Gourdine

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 10, 1996No. 24444PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Moore, Justice:

Petitioner was convicted of accessory before the fact of armed robbery of a McDonald’s restaurant. The Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction but remanded for resentencing. State v. Gourdine, Op. No. 95-UP-040 (S.C. Ct. App. filed February 14, 1995). We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Petitioner did not testify at his trial below. Three witnesses who had pled guilty to the robbery testified against petitioner. Two testified a BB gun and a toy or water gun were used in the robbery. The other testified a “play M-16” water gun and a toy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DraytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. ToddSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. TascoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. HeckCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Dempsey v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Suber v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. BennettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. StarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API