Legal Opinion
La Maina v. Brannon
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 27, 1992No. Civ. 92-1644(JBS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMANDLE, District Judge:.
Defendant James J. Brannon, pro se, removed this matter from the Superior Court of New Jersey and seeks a declaratory judgment that the state courts of Delaware are the proper forum to determine the custody and child support issues raised by the underlying complaint. Plaintiff Stephenie La- Maina has moved to remand the matter to the Superior Court of New Jersey and for sanctions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion shall be denied, and plaintiff’s motion to remand shall be. granted, while plaintiff’s motion for Rule 11 sanctions…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ankenbrandt Ex Rel. L. R. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Acme Markets, Inc. v. Wharton Hardware & Supply Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Hampton v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1999
- Adler v. AdlerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Arnold v. CSX Hotels, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2002
- Cahill v. KendallDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.