Legal Opinion

Doerhoefer v. Farrell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1896PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Union: Robert Eakin, Judge. Action by A. L. Schmidt, trustee, against the Oregon Gold Mining Company, to foreclose a mortgage. Petition by John Doerhoefer to have a redemption by J. H. Farrell set aside. A demurrer to said petition was sustained, and Doerhoefer appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bean.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to a petition asking the court below to set aside the redemption by respondent of certain property purchased by the appellant at a foreclosure sale. The facts are that on October twenty-first, eighteen hundred and ninety-four, a decree was regularly given and entered by the Circuit Court of Union County foreclosing a mortgage made by the Oregon Gold Mining Company to one A. L. Schmidt, trustee, and ordering a sale of the mortgaged premises to satisfy the amount secured thereby. Thereafter, and on the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Stamate v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Reichert v. Sooy-SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Hansen v. DayOregon Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API