Legal Opinion

Stamate v. Peterson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1968PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Grantees of certain mortgage debtors, whose land had been sold on foreclosure, appeal from the order directing the sheriff to execute a deed to the mortgagee-purchasers. Error is assigned to the trial court’s refusal to honor a purported notice of intent to redeem within one year.

The mode of redeeming is set forth’in OPS 23.570. The right to redeem is strictly statutory, equitable rights of the mortgagors having been extinguished by the foreclosure suit. Redemption, therefore, must be pursued in accordance with the applicable statutes, and not other-wise. See Herrmann v. Churchill, 235 Or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haskin v. GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Dray v. DrayOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Kirk v. WoodsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Herrmann v. ChurchillOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Reichert v. Sooy-SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Household Finance Corp. v. BaconCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Schneider v. Emanuel HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. Federal Land Bank of Spokane v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Hornbuckle v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. State v. PetersenOregon Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API