Legal Opinion

People v. Lee Sare Bo

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1887No. 20256PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior^Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

Defendant was convicted of murder, and sentenced to be hanged. His counsel presents for our consideration seven assignments of alleged error.

I. Gon Yen, widow of Ah Chuck, whom it is alleged defendant killed, -was called as a witness by the prosecution and testified against the objection of defendant to a declaration made by her husband immediately after the shooting, in which he stated that the defendant shot him. The prosecution claimed that the statement was made by Ah Chuck under a sense and belief of impending death, and without any hope of recovery, and was therefore admissible as a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. GoldensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People v. PollockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. People v. PaulsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People v. PutmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. People v. Chun HeongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API