Legal Opinion

Cross v. Tustin

California Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1951No. S. F. 18413PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiff appealed from orders denying motions to impeach and vacate and to amend a settled statement of the oral proceedings on the trial of her petition in mandamus, and from orders dismissing her motions for a new trial of her motions. The defendants have moved to dismiss the appeals on the ground that the orders are nonappealable.

On December 6, 1948, after passing a regular competitive examination, Nancy Cross was appointed Senior Personnel Technician of Santa Clara County. She thereupon entered upon a six-month probationary period of employment. On March 2,1949, she was dismissed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. McGuinness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Litvinuk v. LitvinukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Averill v. LincolnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Raps v. RapsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Estate of ChartersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. GrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Ivancovich v. MeierArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Perez v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Roca Bacó v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API