Legal Opinion

Barackman v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 18, 2004No. 9908-08315; A112472PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff in a personal injury action that arose from an automobile accident. Among other things, plaintiff sought damages from defendant for alleged injuries to her teeth. Defendant asserted as an affirmative defense that plaintiffs claim for damages for her injured teeth was barred by issue preclusion because arbitrators had found in an arbitration proceeding between plaintiff and her automobile insurance company that her teeth had not been injured in the accident. The trial court granted summary judgment to plaintiff on the defense. Defendant assigns…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Carrier v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Shuler v. Distribution Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Mazorol v. CoatsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. Mazorol v. CoatsOregon Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barackman v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Barackman v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. Garcia Hernandez v. Farmers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. Garcia Hernandez v. Farmers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API