Legal Opinion

Mazorol v. Coats

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1993No. CC 87-CV-0212-WE; CA A50694; SC S37382PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*369PETERSON, J.

This case, like Carrier v. Hicks, 316 Or 341, 851 P2d 581 (1993), decided this day, involves a claim against the Oregon Insurance Guaranty Association (OIGA) under ORS 734.510 etseq. Plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident with another motorist whose liability insurer became insolvent. Plaintiff made a claim under his own uninsured motorist liability coverage (UM coverage), the claim went to arbitration, and plaintiff was awarded $9,902. Plaintiffs total UM coverage was $100,000.

Plaintiff then continued with an action that he had filed against the other motorist and his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carrier v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Mazorol v. CoatsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bird v. Norpac Foods, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. GILLISPIE v. ESTES EXPRESS LINES, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
  3. Barackman v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Safeco Insurance v. LaskeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Foltz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API