Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. New England Dressed Meat & Wool Co. v. Roberts

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1898PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered October 2, 1897, reversing the determination of the comptroller of the state of New York assessing a corporation tax upon the respondent for three years ending Octobér 31, 1896. The tax was assessed under the provisions of chapter 542, Laws 1880, as amended, and under article nine of the present Tax Law (Cli. 908, Laws 1896). The amount of the tax was originally…

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered October 2, 1897, reversing the determination of the comptroller of the state of New York assessing a corporation tax upon the respondent for three years ending Octobér 31, 1896. The tax was assessed under the provisions of chapter 542, Laws 1880, as amended, and under article nine of the present Tax Law (Cli. 908, Laws 1896). The amount of the tax was originally fixed at $2,241.24 for the six years preceding October 31,1896. Upon a rehearing, it being made to appear that a former…

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The principal and most important question involved in this case is, whether the business conducted by the relator in this state was manufacturing within the meaning and intent of the corporation tax laws, by the provisions of which manufacturing corporations carrying on “manufacture” within the state are exempt from the operation of the laws relating to corporation taxes.

Briefly stated, the principal business carried on by the relator was the purchasing of sheep and lambs, slaughtering them, pulling the wool from the hides or pelts, selling it, selling the hides, taking from the animals the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lorillard v. . the Town of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. The People v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. People Ex Rel. Union Pacific Tea Co. v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Weiland Packing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Rieck-McJunkin Dairy Co. v. Pittsburgh School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Boston & Maine Railroad v. Town of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Assessors of Boston v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. In re Hudson River Electric Power Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1909

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API