Legal Opinion

Marvin Furniture (Shanghai) Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 11, 2014No. 2013-1156PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNA, Circuit Judge.

Marvin Furniture (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. (“Marvin”) appeals a final decision of the Court of International Trade sustaining a rescission by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) of Marvin’s new shipper review in connection with an anti-dumping order on wooden bedroom furniture from the People’s Republic of China. Marvin Furniture (Shanghai) Co. v. United States, 867 F.Supp.2d 1302 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2012). For the reasons below, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

In 2005, Commerce issued an antidump-ing duty order on wooden bedroom furniture from the People’s Republic of China. See Wooden…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Mid Continent Nail Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  4. Arko Foods International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  5. Marvin Furniture (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Haixing Jingmei Chemical Products Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
  3. Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API